Friday 27 May 2016 Home | Sitemap | Contact Us

  Research Papers  |  Books  |  Items
Security Trends South Asia » India Defence » Indian Air Force: Wither Offensive Air Support in 1962
Rahul Bhonsle

Oct 6, 2012

Print Bookmark Email

Indian Air Force: Wither Offensive Air Support in 1962

The 1962 War with China saw the proud record of the Indian Armed Forces which had participated in the First and the Second World Wars sullied at the hands of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Amongst the many lessons learnt from the War was the non use of offensive air power by the Indian side. This has remained one of the enigmas of 1962 which has been debated across the board. On the 80th Anniversary of the Indian Air Force (IAF) controversy over India abdicating the use of offensive air power in 1962 India China War has again cropped up.

The IAF Chief, Air Chief Marshal Norman Browne in the traditional pre IAF Day media conference remarked that the IAF was not allowed to be used in an offensive role and was restricted to only the transport role. "If offensive airpower had been used in 1962, the outcome would have been very different...it would have changed the course of the war," said Air Chief Marshal N A K Browne. He indicated that there would be no such limitations in a future war scenario. Browne stated,   “These are open and glaring lessons [of non use of the IAF in 1962 operations] we should have imbibed,” he added. “I can assure you there will be no such limitation. The IAF will play a leading role in not just against that or any other sector but anywhere whenever the need arises.”

The Indian Air Force official web page highlights the restricted transport role in 1962 thus, “During the period 20 October to 20 November, pressure on the Service's transport and helicopter units were intense, troops and supplies having to be flown to the support of the border posts virtually around the clock and at extreme altitudes. The helicopters had to constantly run the gauntlet of Chinese small arms and anti-aircraft fire, while operating on the tricky helipads in the mountains. Many notable feats were performed by the IAF during this conflict, including the operation of C-119Gs from airstrips 17,000 ft (5180m) above sea level in the Karakoram Himalayas, and the air-lifting by An-12Bs of two troops of AMX-13 light tanks to Chushul, in Ladakh, where the small airstrip was 15,000 ft (4570m) above sea level”.

Analysts as Group Captain (in 2003) R. Sukumaran of the Indian Air Force writing in the July 2003 issue of Strategic Analysis, a Journal published by the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, a government funded think tank in New Delhi cite mainly three reasons for the same. An over assessment of potential of the PLA Air Force by the Intelligence Bureau (IB) led the political leadership to play safe and avoid retaliation which would have exposed Indian populated centres in the plains to strikes by the Chinese aircraft. The US Ambassador Mr John Kenneth Galbraith was reported to have prevailed on the political leadership not to use the Air Force to prevent escalation while finally it is said that the Air Force itself was hesitant due to difficulties in providing close air support to troops in the jungle terrain in NEFA without ground to air communications.  

What ever it be hindsight reveals that this decision possibly could be one of the key factors which led to the debacle of sorts. In 1962, PLA Air Force (PLAAF) did not have the capability to operate from airfields in Tibet, nor could it have undertaken operations from the Chinese Mainland. That the IB did not take any inputs from the IAF was very obvious for use of offensive air support by the Indian side would have greatly assisted overcoming the asymmetry in terms of fire power that existed on the ground. For instance the 7 Infantry Brigade which disintegrated in the battle had only two 75 mm artillery pieces to support it. While the IAF may have had some hesitation in providing close support it could have carried out interdiction of Chinese forces exposed in the build up at various stages on the Tibetan Plateau.
    
Indian Army planners including Lt General SPP Thorat GOC in C Eastern Command in 1960 and Maj. Gen. D. K. Palit, the Director, Military Operations (DMO) had very clearly outlined that offensive air support was a feasible option. But the Army leadership was unable to convince the political hierarchy and even the IAF of the necessity for offensive air support.

Today while the IAF chief is confident that the situation has changed and no such restriction will be binding, the PLAAF has considerably enhanced potential. Thus the threat of launching air operations on city centers in India may be real. IAF on the other hand may have no counter value targets in Tibet.

However on the whole in many ways 1962 operations could also be seen as a turning point of sorts for the IAF as the IAF web site states that an, “ambitious expansion to a 45-squadron force which was sanctioned by the Government in October 1962, this calling for the raising of IAF personnel strength to some 100,000 by the early seventies”. The combat squadron strength of the IAF has however never reached the figure of 45, today it remains at 34 squadrons.

Related Tags



 

Related Article

Floods, landslides kill 14 in Sri Lanka, affect over 900,000
Jammu and Kashmir Cease Fire Violations and Infiltration
Wen Jiabao Visit: Defining Concerns
Dubious Chinese investments in Sri Lanka's Satellite sector raising national security concerns - report
BRANDING FOR DEFENCE COMPANIES IN INDIA
Special Training CRPF for Counter Naxal Operations
12 Suspected Militants Arrested in Bangladesh
DRDO Workshop on Disaster Risk Reduction and Preparedness
Demilitarisation in Kashmir: Technology a Partial Answer
Kalam stresses economic development in anti-terrorism fight
Maldivian militant killed in Syrian suicide attack
IAF Contingent for Ex Red Flag Departs
PM Modi Outlines India's Maritime Strategy
Crimean’s unofficial visit to India caused a stir
India Germany Defence Relations
Inaugural U.S.-India-Japan Trilateral Ministerial Dialogue in New York
Ukraine and Crimea: India Retains Balance
PAKISTAN : A CIVILIAN PRESIDENT
IAF Receives 6th C-17 Globemaster III
Interlocutors: A Mild Political Initiative
US Pakistan Relations – ISI The Hub
NHRC celebrates Human Rights Day
Political developments
Talks with Taliban: Way to Afghan Stability?
PAKISTAN : POLITICAL AND MILITANCY CHAOS
53.9 Percent Indigenisation Claimed
STRIDE 2014 Organised by CASTLE
MH 370 and ISAR 2014 In Kuala Lumpur
Union Home Secretary reviews status of bridges in LWE-affected States
Radical Separatists: the Core Problem
Surveillance by USA of Indian Entities
Cabinet Secretary Reviews Drought Situation
Maldives a target of regional terrorists
India's Look East Policy
Visit of Indian Warships to Bahrain
Indian Surveillance Network in the Indian Ocean Region
Chinese Defense Ministry efforts made to reschedule Carter Visit
Shipwright School Commissioned as INS Vishwakarma
Army Day Seminar on Capability Development and Indigenisation of Indian Army in a Futuristic Context
China Space Capabilities
India to Handover Fast Attack Craft INS Tarasa to Seychelles Coast Guard
Villagers caught in row
Army Procurement May Pick Momentum
Concerns of Revival of Militancy in Punjab
Global Condemnation of Attack on Rabbani
INDIA’S DEFENCE BUDGET: OVERCOMING PERSISTENT STRUCTURAL CHALLENGES
Pitching India’s Concerns on Relations with China
Russian Fight back, Israel hard sell and French dilemma Mark Opening of Aero India 2013
Nuclear Fizzle Debate
India Germany Relations: Can Eurofighter Be the Next Driver?

 

Article by Same Author

Bhutan China Relations and India
Is Pakistan Army Launching Operations in North Waziristan?
Indo US Relations: Main Agenda of Kerry Visit
India China and Lure of the Himalayas
Bihar: Neglecting Preventive Counter Terror Drills
Is India Talking to the Wrong Sharif in Pakistan?
Pakistan’s Coming Civil Military Standoff?
Maldives: Early Elections May Diffuse Crisis
Reducing Vulnerability of India’s Terror Fault lines
Indigenisation of Capital Acquisitions
Armed Forces Modernisation and Upgradation
PM Modis Twitter Diplomacy: The Pluses and Minuses
India Russia Defence Relations: Setbacks but Stable
Security Imperatives of Indo Pakistan Dialogue
Ukraine and Crimea: India Retains Balance
Carter’s India Visit: The China Factor
Pakistan’s National Security Dilemma: Prioritising Internal Security
Kashmir Terrorism Uptick: Portends or Empty Threats?
The World Must Cheer Afghanistan's Football Victory
South Asia 2014: As A Flash Back of 2013
India-Pakistan: Low Hanging Fruits and Stumbling Block of Siachen
What to Expect of Defence Budget 2014- 15?
Pak Elections – Economy, India Pak Relations, Provinces and the Army
Navy Chief’s Resignation: A Survey Of The Big Picture
India in a Spot in Bangladesh
Indian Army: One Plains Strike Corps Too Many
Nawaz continues to dither on top military appointments
Talks With Rebels
Smart Strategies For Defence Indigenisation
New Chapter in India Ukraine Defence Cooperation
India China Fruitful Engagements
New Army Chief’s LOC Comments: Onus On Front Line Troops
Jointness: Single Point Defence Agenda for Modi Government
Tomahawk Precision Strike: The US Military Option in Syria
Trade versus Security – India’s China Dilemma?
Priotise Decapacitation of Lashkar E Islam in Kashmir
Is India’s Defence Acquisition Process Maturing?
Is India’s Regional “Honey Moon,” Over?
India’s Defence Budget 2012-13: A Holistic Analysis
Is Bangladesh On the Sights of Al Qaeda?
India’s Asia Pacific Rebalancing?
Nawaz Prompt Felicitations from India underline hopes
India in Maldives: Big Brother Must Deliver
NSCN IM Blames Government for Failure of Peace Talks
Talking to Pak without a Counter-Terror Strategy
A Seven Level Counter Radicalisation Response
Pakistan : Winds of Political Change?
India’s Defence and Security Policy: In Flux
South Asian Elections: Bomb Makers in Demand
Ex Sudarshan Shakti – Integrated Theatre, Network Centricity

 
ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb






Home | Security Trends South Asia | Security Issues South Asia | Top Stories | Publication  | Events | About Us | Contact Us | Disclaimer  | Privacy Policy
© Copyright of Security-risks 2016 All Rights Reserved Web Design India Internet
In case you come across any suspicious activity, any suspicious movement or have any information to tell to the Anti-Terror Squad, please take a note of the new ALL INDIA TOLL-FREE Terror Help-line "1090". Your city's Police or Anti-Terror squad will take action as quickly as possible. Remember that this single number 1090 is valid all over India. This is a toll free number and can be dialled from mobile phones also. Moreover, the identity of the caller will be kept a secret.

Please try to make aware each and every citizen of India about this facility.

BC is the westernmost of Canada's provinces and is famed for its natural beauty.Vancouver is BC's largest city.