|
Afghan Strategic
Partnership Regional Response
|
Likely to
Oppose US Presence Post 2014
|
Supporting/Ambivalent
US Presence Post 2014
|
|
Russia
|
India
|
|
China
|
Other
Central Asian Republics
|
|
Iran
|
|
|
Kazakhstan
|
|
|
Pakistan
|
|
The Loya Jirga held in Afghanistan from 16 to 19 November has virtually
accepted the presence of US troops in Afghanistan for a period of 10 years
beyond 2014 that is up to 2024. This has raised varied reactions from regional
stake holders given possibility of semi permanent presence of extra regional
powers in the periphery. Russian
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told reporters following a meeting in Moscow
with his Kazakh counterpart, "----, it is important to understand what
tasks will be solved by the military bases in Afghanistan, which will stay
there after the announced withdrawal of troops in 2014," Lavrov said. Kazakh Foreign Minister Yerzhak Kazykhanov
spoke on similar lines, saying that, "The countries of the region and
large powers should re-confirm their adherence to the territorial integrity and
sovereignty of Afghanistan. In my view, the main efforts should be aimed at
prompt stabilization of the situation in the country and its economic
rehabilitation," the minister said.
While there has been no official Chinese reaction as
compared to the Russians or the Indians who have criticized and welcomed the
strategic cooperation agreement between Afghanistan and US respectively,
normally Chinese media reports as that by Xinhua denote the official line which
seems to be rejection of US presence in Afghanistan beyond 2014. Xinhua report
commenting on the national jirga said, “in its latest efforts to achieve
durable peace in the militancy-plagued country, the Afghan government convened
the traditional Loya Jirga or grand assembly of chieftains, notables and
functionaries last week to discuss the proposed Washington-Kabul strategic
partnership, but received mixed reactions at home and abroad”. Iran’s opposition to US presence in Afghanistan
is now well recorded.
Thus whether there would be some
pressure on Afghanistan to reduce the tenure or to curtail the deployment
remains to be seen, but this would certainly strain relations between Kabul and
regional partners including Russia. Alternately Russia may link the US presence
in the country with other European issues such as missile defence and demand
concessions on that front, so how the overall Russia US relations shape up also
will dictate the Afghan pact.
Against this back drop Afghanistan
is careful that it does not go into the Bonn Conference after signing an
agreement with the US. For this will be certainly criticized by regional
players thereby putting President Karzai in an embarrassing situation with
major countries such as Iran and Russia openly opposing a longer stay for the
US in the country. Meanwhile given likely drop in relations between Pakistan
and the US there would be problems from that end as well. Thus how the overall
regional resistance builds up and what form it takes in Bonn and beyond remains
to be seen. The Afghan government seems to be playing safe to sign any
agreement before the same except for the Indian one in the kitty.
While
the focus is on the Afghan agreement with the US there have been a number of
parallel ones that have been signed with regional players. India is the first
while UK is also in the line up after the Bonn Conference, thus the trends seem
to be universal. The Meshrano Jirga, upper house of Parliament also approved
three agreements with Iran, Russia and Tajikistan.
Mindful
of these concerns, the delicate balancing that both India and Afghanistan have
been doing over Indo Afghan strategic partnership agreement inked last month is
evident with both President Karzai and Indian external affairs minister
indicating that this was not against any other country and would take into
account the sensitivity of Pakistan at the Istanbul Conference. There are
concerns that Pakistan would view the agreement in terms of a zero sum game by
both India and Afghanistan to hedge against a security threat from Islamabad by
working a joint agreement amongst themselves. However it is evident that with
gradual improvement between India Pakistan relations there has been a spin off
in Afghanistan as well as and Pakistan does not seem to be viewing the Indo
Afghan treaty as harmful to its interests as would have been otherwise thought
to be just a few months ago. However skeptics are still worried and the true
test of acceptance will come if there is no attack against Indian assets in
Afghanistan.
|