Saturday 30 April 2016 Home | Sitemap | Contact Us

  Research Papers  |  Books  |  Items
Security Issues South Asia » Regional Security » BRICS: Towards Political and Security Muscle?
Rahul Bhonsle

Jan 11, 2013

Print Bookmark Email

BRICS: Towards Political and Security Muscle?

 The first tentative moves by BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) to find a political voice and influence security discourse were evident in New Delhi on 10 January 2013, with the BRICS Meeting of High Representatives (HR) on National Security.  Briefing the media India’s National Security Adviser (NSA) Shiv Shanker Menon outlined importance of the occasion as the first stand alone meet of the NSAs/HRs as previous occasions were essentially held as a preparatory to BRICS summit. Even the Delhi NSR/HR meet could be called as a preliminary for the Durban Summit in March 2013 however the theme was no doubt different. Going by Mr Menon’s words, there were some weighty global issues that were discussed in particular the hot spots of Syria,  Libya and Mali as well as contemporary and emerging threats such as terrorism, piracy and cyber.

Conversion of a bilateral relationship with these countries which are on the fault lines of instability due to varied factors such as intervention (Libya), civil war (Syria) and expansion of international terrorism (Mali) to common multilateral approach of stability was possibly the most contentious issue that was discussed during the meet. While BRICS countries have some influence in these troubled states apart from Russia that has political and military weight to be an agent of change, others remain by standers. Thus most of the discussion is likely to add to an understanding of various points of view rather than evolution of a common policy.   

BRICS are also clearly steering away from bilateral issues such as recent conflagration on the Line of Control between India and Pakistan or China’s spats with its neighbours in East and South East Asia. Possibly in the bilateral between the NSAs/HRs these issues may have been discussed.

Thus what new perspective has emerged from the deliberation is not clear. At least on the Syrian imbroglio, it is apparent from responses by Mr Shiv Shanker Menon in the media conference that BRICS countries have reiterated their positions on the issue condemning injection of terrorist groups and looking for a political solution where none is in sight in the near future. A stronger response could have been evolved.

For a group as disparate as BRICS which has been triggered by Goldman Sachs rather than a natural alignment of likeminded forces, entering the political and security arena is highly significant. While the commonalities of BRICS are well known there are many disparities as well which may militate against evolving a viable common minimum political agenda. While BRICS population is over 40 percent of the World its contribution to the global GDP is just about 20 percent plus or half of that figure. It is obvious to pull its weight BRICS has the people mass but lacks the economic mass without which political weight in today’s world cannot be attained.

The differential power configuration of the grouping where in Russia and China is permanent members of the UN Security Council while Brazil and India are seen as possible contenders to the high table and regional powers. South Africa is seen by many as a laggard even in its own continent.  There are differences in perception as well with India and Brazil seen aligned with the West on many issues while China and Russia have maintained their unique status. This was more than evident when during the initial stages of the Syrian civil war; it was a mission from IBSA (India, Brazil and South Africa) rather than BRICS that went to Damascus to initiate dialogue with Mr Assad while China and Russia stayed away. Given these incongruities how far BRICS can gravitate towards a common agenda in the political and security spectrum remains to be seen. For now perhaps well begun could be just about done.

Gathering from a summary of the meet of NSAs/HRs to generate momentum BRICS needs a permanent mechanism as at present there are only Sherpas, expert and adhoc working groups for specific issues. Sherpas or adhoc groups obviously have other jobs to do thus their attention to BRICS despite the best intentions remains adhoc. Without a stronger institution to support the deliberations, BRICS may find it difficult to develop momentum particularly on political and security issues which require sustained follow up by governments unlike economic where track two interests of business lobbies also act as triggers. Institutionalisation of BRICS thus assumes priority and may take some time given that this is not on the agenda for the Durban summit.

Mr Menon the ever pragmatist summed it up best when he said in response to a question, “So, there is a long list of things that we think we should be looking at as BRICS. But if you ask me today what have you done, I will say what we have done is take another step forward on this rather long road which we will keep walking on”.

For BRICS to move from the one concrete idea on the horizon, a BRICS infrastructure bank to something more substantial there is a long road ahead indeed.

Related Tags


Related Article

BRICS Initiative on Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA)
How the US and Iran Reached Their Landmark Deal?
BRICS and Afghanistan
BRICS: Strong Push for Independent Voice
BRICS to RIC - Multilateralism Trends
The Greek Vote and the EU Miscalculation
A Year of Smart Diplomacy: Milestones 2015
Sixth Brics Summit – Fortaleza Declaration
Indian Prime Minister’s Five Point Formula for BRICS
BRICS and Iran Nuclear Issue
India’s Interlocking Engagements and the New Asian Chessboard
US Defence Secretary Carter Visit: A Test of India’s Multi-Alignment Foreign Policy
India-Russia Annual Summit: Deepening Strategic Partnership
BRICS Summit in Durban: Bank Remains in Limbo


Article by Same Author

India’s Defence Budget 2014-15: New Acquisitions Challenged
Underlying BDCA Message – exercise restraint – Leadership to Military
Tweaking the “Tweet Policy,” for the Indian Armed Forces
Maldives Elections: Updated
Standing While Running: India China Relations
Exercise Sarvada Vijay & Azm E Nau A Brief Comparison
Karzai's India Visit: The Agenda
Nawaz Prompt Felicitations from India underline hopes
India in a Spot in Bangladesh
Raisina Dialogue, Cold War 2.0 and India’s Foreign Policy
France Emerging as Third Pole In Defence Co-Operation with India
Is India Talking to the Wrong Sharif in Pakistan?
Smart Strategies For Defence Indigenisation
Chicago Summit, NATO & India: Lost Opportunity
To Avoid Flip Flops Inject Transparency in India’s Pak Policy
Indian Navy - Beyond Platform Centrism
Afghanistan: Afghan Army Emerging From Shadows of NATO?
Boeing’s First India Defence Contract Challenge
PM Modis Twitter Diplomacy: The Pluses and Minuses
Maldives: Early Elections May Diffuse Crisis
NSCN IM Blames Government for Failure of Peace Talks
FDI in Defence: Jaitley Empowers Indian Defence Industry
Trade versus Security – India’s China Dilemma?
Indian Defence: “Doberman,” Style Reforms Necessary
Trends in Operations in Afghanistan in 2012
India in SCO
Pakistan Exercise Azm-e-Nau 4: Checkmating India’s Cold Start?
Indo US Relations: Main Agenda of Kerry Visit
Mazagon Dock Pipavav: First Defence Joint Venture
India’s Bangladesh Dilemma Gets More Complex
Defence allotments remain in estimated range
Maldives Presidential Elections: Political Instability May Continue
Pakistan – A Turbulent Beginning to 2013?
Clinton’s South Asia Visit: Beyond Bonding with Mamata
Bihar: Neglecting Preventive Counter Terror Drills
India’s Defence Procurement Procedure: Missing the Wood for the Trees
Gaza: India Must Stand for Proportionate Response
How Relevant is the UNMOGIP- UN Observer Mission in India and Pakistan
Assam: Peace Moves and Tribulations
Is Pakistan Army Launching Operations in North Waziristan?
Myanmar – China Boost Relations
Is India’s Defence Acquisition Process Maturing?
Bangladesh – Arming Without Aiming?
Civil Military Relations in Pakistan: Memogate
Security Imperatives For India’s New Government
What to Expect of Defence Budget 2014- 15?
India – Pakistan - South Asia’s Zero Sum Game
Manmohan Visit to Washington: Rejuvenating Indo US Relations
US Defence Secretary Carter Visit: A Test of India’s Multi-Alignment Foreign Policy

Y! MyWeb

Home | Security Trends South Asia | Security Issues South Asia | Top Stories | Publication  | Events | About Us | Contact Us | Disclaimer  | Privacy Policy
© Copyright of Security-risks 2016 All Rights Reserved Web Design India Internet
In case you come across any suspicious activity, any suspicious movement or have any information to tell to the Anti-Terror Squad, please take a note of the new ALL INDIA TOLL-FREE Terror Help-line "1090". Your city's Police or Anti-Terror squad will take action as quickly as possible. Remember that this single number 1090 is valid all over India. This is a toll free number and can be dialled from mobile phones also. Moreover, the identity of the caller will be kept a secret.

Please try to make aware each and every citizen of India about this facility.

BC is the westernmost of Canada's provinces and is famed for its natural beauty.Vancouver is BC's largest city.