|
Pitching India’s Concerns on Relations with China
India’s Foreign
Secretary Ms Nirupama Rao has moved up to her job through the chair of the
ambassador in Beijing and thus knows China very well. She put various issues on
Sino Indian relations in perspective in a speech in New York on 12 February
2011. Some of the key facets are reproduced in original below to provide a
clear understanding of the Indian point of view without any
editorialising.
An Assertive China. China has, of
course, begun to deal in the currency of global power and its economic success
is impacting its foreign defense and security policies. Now the appellation of
assertiveness is frequently applied to China’s global profile today. But I
really believe that neither of us have a luxury of seeing each other in purely
antagonistic terms. The view that India and China are rivals to me is an over
generalization as well as an over simplification of a complex relationship
which encompasses so many diverse issues. I believe that the proposition of
competition and rivalries should not be exaggerated in a manner that it over
shadows our genuine attempts to manage and transact a rationally determined
relationship between India and China.
The Boundary Question. There is no
denying the fact that we have a disputed border. There are legacies as well as
lessons bequeathed to us by history. The boundary question is a complex
problem. The cartographies that define national identity are internalized in
the minds of people of both countries. At the same time, we are making a
serious attempt to arrive at a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable
solution of the boundary question as the recent fourteenth round of talks of
the special representatives, appointed by both governments, will testify.
The absence of a
solution to the question is not due to lack of effort; instead it arises from
the difficulty of the question itself, as any analyst in the audience would
surely appreciate. What also needs to be appreciated is that the India-China
boundary is one of the most peaceful of all borders. We have in place an
organized set of measures or what we call the confidence building measures, or
CBMs, to ensure peace or tranquillity in the border areas. We are currently
talking to each other on establishing more such mechanisms. I believe there is
maturity on both sides to understand the complexity of the issue and to
insulate it from affecting our boarder relationship. I believe this policy has
paid dividends and has contributed towards reducing the possibility of
conflict.
Defence Exchanges. I would like to
delve briefly on defense exchanges between India and China because when you
talk about the boundary question, you also dwell on the role of what the
respective defense establishments would be. We have had defence exchanges
between India and China, including small scale anti-terrorism related military
exercises. At present, our high level military exchanges are on hold and I do
not know how many of you are following this debate in the media, of late, but
some differences have arisen over the fact that China recently did not accept
an army delegation from our northern command. But, all the same, flag meetings
of border personnel along the line of actual control have continued. So, the
situation in the border areas remains tranquil. So, when it comes to defence
exchanges I believe it would be right for me to say that there is desire to
slowly expand these exchanges that there have been limits to this process.
Role of PLA. I think that a question
here again which is debated quite often these days is about the role of the
Peoples Liberation Army. Is it more assertive than before? What is the
contribution it makes to the formation of foreign policy vis-à-vis China’s
neighbours?
Sino Pakistan Relationship. At the same
time we do not hesitate to stress our genuine concerns regarding some aspects of
the Pakistan-China relationship particularly when it comes to China’s presence
in Pakistan occupied Kashmir, China’s policy on Jammu and Kashmir and
China-Pakistan security and nuclear relationship. Here we have welcomed a more
open discussion with China on these issues and I believe as mutual confidence
grows in this relationship we will have more opportunities to discuss these
issues and also to seek more clarity and more transparency in regard to the
concerns that we have raised.
Stapled Visas. The issue of giving
stapled visas to Indian nationals from the state of Jammu and Kashmir also
arises in a similar context. So these are issues that are of concern to us when
it comes to the China-Pakistan relationship. Because when China gives the stapled
visa to an Indian living in Jammu and Kashmir, the inference that we draw out
of this is somehow the status of Jammu and Kashmir is being questioned by
China. The issue of Indian sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir is being
questioned by China. This is an issue that we need to resolve. The Chinese
Government has told us that they are giving serious attention to this and they
would like to see this resolved and we are hoping that there would be
satisfactory resolution to this. We believe that the India-China relationship
will grow even stronger once China show more sensitivity on these core issues
that we feel impinge our sovereignty and our territorial integrity and we hope
that this can be realized.
Security Architecture in Asia. Finally,
what I would like to say is that, people talk about security architectures for
Asia. Here again there is immense scope for India and China to engage in closer
dialogue with each other. Because there are issues of maritime security, the
issues concerning global commerce in our region, the issue of terrorism, the
issue of just ensuring that we have a peaceful periphery; all these we share
common concerns. We have stressed rather than excluding China from any debate
or discussion on security in our region, it would be rational to follow up more
inclusive approach that involves more engagement with China, more discussion,
more exchange of ideas with Chinese stakeholders, so that we have balanced and
inclusive security architecture in our region. And this will support India and China.
Peace between India and China. As India
and China pursue their interests, so long as their overwhelming preoccupation
remains their domestic transformation, both of us will understand that the
realization of this goal requires a peaceful environment around us. The reality
is that both our countries have worked hard over the last two decades to
enhance dialogue in a number of fields and we must maintain and build on that
trend. [MHA India Press Release].
|